<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch the Watchmen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1000monkeys.com/2009/03/watch-the-watchmen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1000monkeys.com/2009/03/watch-the-watchmen</link>
	<description>They'll Come Up With Something Eventually.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 04:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://1000monkeys.com/2009/03/watch-the-watchmen#comment-20682</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1000monkeys.com/?p=878#comment-20682</guid>
		<description>On the nose... with a hammer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the nose&#8230; with a hammer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://1000monkeys.com/2009/03/watch-the-watchmen#comment-20678</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1000monkeys.com/?p=878#comment-20678</guid>
		<description>Something I should mention: In the time since posting this review, I&#039;ve had occasion to see some interviews and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/0fa2bdeb11/watchmen-tour-with-malin-ackerman#player&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;other &quot;non-acting&quot;&lt;/a&gt; appearances of Malin Akerman, and it seems pretty clear that she naturally speaks with an American accent, so that would-be excuse for her odd delivery probably isn&#039;t valid.  (Matthew Goode, on the other hand, is definitely entirely British.)  Just thought I should set the record straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I should mention: In the time since posting this review, I&#8217;ve had occasion to see some interviews and <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/0fa2bdeb11/watchmen-tour-with-malin-ackerman#player" rel="nofollow">other &#8220;non-acting&#8221;</a> appearances of Malin Akerman, and it seems pretty clear that she naturally speaks with an American accent, so that would-be excuse for her odd delivery probably isn&#8217;t valid.  (Matthew Goode, on the other hand, is definitely entirely British.)  Just thought I should set the record straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://1000monkeys.com/2009/03/watch-the-watchmen#comment-20677</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1000monkeys.com/?p=878#comment-20677</guid>
		<description>I agree with you!  I just thought that the hackneyed obviousness of it fit the tone of the film perfectly.  I read a review elsewhere that referred to most of the music choices as &lt;i&gt;on the nose&lt;/i&gt;&#8212;that seemed like a good way to describe it to me.  I guess I just think that in a movie where you have characters saying things like, &quot;We can &lt;i&gt;save&lt;/i&gt; this world!&quot; it&#039;s completely appropriate to occasionally elicit groans from your audience with your music selections as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you!  I just thought that the hackneyed obviousness of it fit the tone of the film perfectly.  I read a review elsewhere that referred to most of the music choices as <i>on the nose</i>&mdash;that seemed like a good way to describe it to me.  I guess I just think that in a movie where you have characters saying things like, &#8220;We can <i>save</i> this world!&#8221; it&#8217;s completely appropriate to occasionally elicit groans from your audience with your music selections as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://1000monkeys.com/2009/03/watch-the-watchmen#comment-20676</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1000monkeys.com/?p=878#comment-20676</guid>
		<description>TOTALLY disagree with you on use of the music. I could get behind the opening Dylan track, the Apocalypse now nod with Flight of the Valkyries, and even Hendrix&#039;s version of &quot;All Along the Watchtower.&quot; (Oh, and I dug the use of Tears for Fears&#039; &quot;Everybody Wants to Rule the World&quot; as elevator music, as that was clever and subtle. And the snippet of &quot;99 Luftballons&quot; also fit well, with the whole nuclear war thing.) But everything else? Totally obvious and hackneyed. It&#039;s like whoever did the music only listens to soundtracks to other films, and even then, barely does more than give them a passive ear. Oh, it&#039;s a funeral? We&#039;re sad? Let&#039;s play &quot;Sounds of Silence.&quot; It&#039;s the 70s? Let&#039;s hammer that point home with &quot;I&#039;m Your Boogie Man.&quot; And I swear to god, I audibly groaned when they started playing Buckley&#039;s &quot;Hallelujah&quot; during the sex scene. 

Otherwise, I liked the flick. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOTALLY disagree with you on use of the music. I could get behind the opening Dylan track, the Apocalypse now nod with Flight of the Valkyries, and even Hendrix&#8217;s version of &#8220;All Along the Watchtower.&#8221; (Oh, and I dug the use of Tears for Fears&#8217; &#8220;Everybody Wants to Rule the World&#8221; as elevator music, as that was clever and subtle. And the snippet of &#8220;99 Luftballons&#8221; also fit well, with the whole nuclear war thing.) But everything else? Totally obvious and hackneyed. It&#8217;s like whoever did the music only listens to soundtracks to other films, and even then, barely does more than give them a passive ear. Oh, it&#8217;s a funeral? We&#8217;re sad? Let&#8217;s play &#8220;Sounds of Silence.&#8221; It&#8217;s the 70s? Let&#8217;s hammer that point home with &#8220;I&#8217;m Your Boogie Man.&#8221; And I swear to god, I audibly groaned when they started playing Buckley&#8217;s &#8220;Hallelujah&#8221; during the sex scene. </p>
<p>Otherwise, I liked the flick. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://1000monkeys.com/2009/03/watch-the-watchmen#comment-20673</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1000monkeys.com/?p=878#comment-20673</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually intending to devote a whole post (some day) to an issue related to your last point, but in essence I think you have to look at the movie in a vacuum when judging it as a movie.  While the relation to its source material is certainly strong, and there&#039;s a lot included for fans of the book to love or hate based on their own preconceptions, I feel that a truly objective opinion should largely ignore such aspects (something I have not, admittedly, been able to completely do myself).  I do think that your approach is a good way to look at &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; movie, really: given what this movie was attempting to achieve, is it the best it could&#039;ve been?  (Or, as Ebert is fond of saying, &quot;It&#039;s not about what the movie&#039;s about; it&#039;s about &lt;i&gt;how&lt;/i&gt; it&#039;s about what it&#039;s about.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually intending to devote a whole post (some day) to an issue related to your last point, but in essence I think you have to look at the movie in a vacuum when judging it as a movie.  While the relation to its source material is certainly strong, and there&#8217;s a lot included for fans of the book to love or hate based on their own preconceptions, I feel that a truly objective opinion should largely ignore such aspects (something I have not, admittedly, been able to completely do myself).  I do think that your approach is a good way to look at <i>any</i> movie, really: given what this movie was attempting to achieve, is it the best it could&#8217;ve been?  (Or, as Ebert is fond of saying, &#8220;It&#8217;s not about what the movie&#8217;s about; it&#8217;s about <i>how</i> it&#8217;s about what it&#8217;s about.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://1000monkeys.com/2009/03/watch-the-watchmen#comment-20672</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1000monkeys.com/?p=878#comment-20672</guid>
		<description>I have to agree that the 80s references were great.  It was pretty amusing to hear Marc&#039;s son complaining about some of it -- he thought &quot;99 Luftballoons&quot; was horribly inappropriate for the movie, for instance, but later admitted he&#039;d never actually listened to the lyrics.  I didn&#039;t come away quite as positive as you, mostly because I don&#039;t think the movie quite holds up as a movie as you (irony....overwhelming!), but I certainly don&#039;t think it is bad.  As I said in my review, it&#039;s probably the best adaptation of Watchmen we were going to get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree that the 80s references were great.  It was pretty amusing to hear Marc&#8217;s son complaining about some of it &#8212; he thought &#8220;99 Luftballoons&#8221; was horribly inappropriate for the movie, for instance, but later admitted he&#8217;d never actually listened to the lyrics.  I didn&#8217;t come away quite as positive as you, mostly because I don&#8217;t think the movie quite holds up as a movie as you (irony&#8230;.overwhelming!), but I certainly don&#8217;t think it is bad.  As I said in my review, it&#8217;s probably the best adaptation of Watchmen we were going to get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

