Posted by mike in Predictions,Sports at 12:54 am on October 1, 2008

As is presumably understandable for those who know me, this is the most excited I’ve been about the MLB postseason in probably my entire life. That of course leaves a lot of room for disappointment, something that’s definitely not unfamiliar to me (as I’ve written before). Nonetheless, I’m sticking with my original pick of the Cubs making it an even century between World Series wins this year. But before the playoffs begin, I’d like to reflect upon my predictions briefly as they relate to the actual standings at season’s end before making some new predictions for the playoffs.

I was pretty close on the Senior Circuit, picking 3 of the 4 playoff teams correctly. I thought Joe Torre would give the Dodgers enough of a bump to make the playoffs in a weak division, and he did—although Manny Ramirez certainly helped as well. In the Central, I had it going down to the Cubs and Brew Crew, giving the nod to the latter (probably as an attempt to overcompensate for my inherent bias). I didn’t think it possible for the Mets to blow their division for the second year in a row (and for the Phillies to be the benefactors twice in a row, too), but sure enough, that’s where we’re at.

My Junior Circuit picks were much further off. I certainly wasn’t alone in thinking that Seattle would dominate the AL West, but that just means I have plenty of company in being as far off as possible. The Angels, instead, dominated the West and ended up with the best record in all of baseball, although it’s quite inflated due to the other three horrible teams in their division (look at the large discrepancy between actual W-L record and expected W-L record). My Central division choices were almost completely upside-down, but I must say I’m really happy for my friends who are White Sox fans that their team got in—not to mention how cool it is that this is the first time since 1906 that both Chicago teams will play in the postseason, giving us the chance for an El Train Series (although I don’t think that will happen). In the East, I gave too much credit to the arrival of a new skipper in the Bronx, discredited the Red Sox with thoughts of a World Series hangover, and wrote off the Rays along with everybody else.

So I ended up with only 3 of the 8 playoff teams picked correctly, which is no better than I did in 2007. Hopefully I can repeat my redemption from last year by calling the playoffs correctly again now that we know who the participants will be. (Allow me to preemptively apologize to my two regular readers who are named Mark and root for a team called the Sox…)

NL Playoffs

  • NLDS: Cubs logo vs. Dodgers logo
    I honestly think that the Cubs will continue to be the cream of the crop in the National League. Despite their hot bats, the Dodgers will be facing three consecutive ace pitchers, any of whom could be the #1 starter. I don’t think the Dodgers’ bats are hot enough to handle the Cubs’ rotation (not to mention their bullpen). Conversely, I think the Cubs can out-hit the best ERA in the NL. (Cubs in 3)
  • NLDS: Phillies logo vs. Brewers logo
    I think the Phillies are looking to bounce back from last year’s disappointment (as are the Cubs), and the Brewers are happy enough to have broken their 26-year postseason drought. The Brewers will win at least one game, just because they get to put C.C. Sabathia on the mound at least once more this season, but I think that’ll be about it. (Phillies in 4)
  • NLCS: Cubs logo vs. Phillies logo
    This will be a matchup of the two best records in the National League, and the games should reflect it. It’ll be a back-and-forth, hard-fought series, but with no curses or flukes or jinxes or any other bullshit involved, the Cubs will win their first pennant since 1945. (Cubs in 6)

AL Playoffs

  • ALDS: Rays logo vs. White Sox logo
    Will just making their first postseason in franchise history be enough to content Tampa Bay? I think so, but I don’t think the White Sox have enough talent to spoil it for them, although they’ll put up a good fight. (Rays in 5)
  • ALDS: Angels logo vs. Red Sox logo
    All streaks come to an end, and it’s probably time for Boston’s postseason dominance of the Angels to dry up. I don’t think they’ll be able to overcome injuries to Mike Lowell and Josh Beckett enough to be able to stop the best record in the American League (although, as I mentioned, I believe the Angels’ record to be artificially inflated). Just as in 2005, the Sox will bow out early in their bid to repeat as champs. (Angels in 4)
  • ALCS: Angels logo vs. Rays logo
    This may be the least-watched LCS ever, but it might be a pretty good one. I think the average game will be about 17-14, as there’s a lot of power in these two lineups (although there’s a lot of good pitching represented by these two teams, as well—particularly Tampa—so I could be wrong on that). Experience will win out, though, and the Rays can still consider the season a resounding success even without a title, so they’ll go quietly. (Angels in 5)

World Series
Cubs logo vs. Angels logo

WS2008 logo
In a matchup of the two best records in baseball, we should get all you could hope for from a World Series: plenty of good pitching, good fielding, and lots of offensive power. I know it’s lame to pick your own team to win, but I really think that this is going to be their year, so I’m sticking with the Cubs in a hard-fought series. I’ll allow myself to get a bit romantic and say that they’ll be able to win it at Wrigley. (Cubs in 5)

There are some great opportunities for quality matchups this postseason, not to mention some really cool would-be World Series matchups: the aforementioned all-Chicago battle; the potential for the WS to be played at the two oldest ballparks in MLB (Wrigley and Fenway); the chance for a small-market team (Milwaukee or Tampa Bay) to crash the party. Hopefully it lives up to expectations.

Comments (9)

9 Responses to “Welcome to October”:

  • I think you’re going to need a rewrite, Mike. ;-)

  • So much for that. Here’s my new prediction: Manny will come back to haunt his former team as the Dodgers beat Boston in the WS.

  • Now you’re just being mean. :-(

  • I think Cubs fans got ahead of themselves this season, they hypnotized themselves into thinking “Year 100 is IT!” and I think their 97-wins was a bit misleading, especially in a unblanced schedule and winning 14 of 18 from the Pirates. I already know one long-time Cubs fan who is finally giving up on the team. And I guess we know the Angels are now the new chokers.

  • While that may be true, it’s more than just the fact that it happened to be “year 100.” The Cubs were definitely the best team in the NL this year: they were #1 in runs scored, #2 in batting average, #1 in OPS, #3 in ERA, #1 in strikeouts, #1 in BAA… I could go on and on. What is important, though, is how these numbers change when you only take into account August and September—particularly when you then compare them to the Dodgers, a team who got hot as shit after the trade deadline, as we all know.

    Somebody who gives up on his team after a great season (albeit one that ends in disappointment) isn’t much of a fan to begin with. I wish more bandwagon Cubs “fans” would follow suit, it might make tickets easier to get for the rest of us.

    I don’t know if I agree about the Angels. Even when they win the most games in the AL, they seem to still be regarded as the underdogs, which sort of disqualifies them from “chokers” status.

  • Well this fan quoted himself as a “was a 39-year devoted Cubs fan”. I think the old man just had enough. I wouldn’t blame him. And those bandwagon fans (of any team) help the payroll & sport in general.

    And I only got the “Angels are chokers” idea from a Yahoo article (bad on my part). The Red Sox were considered banged up and the Rays inexperienced, and the Angels seemed like the best team with the best closer and the best 3-4 in the A.L., but it took them 22 years to win a game in Boston, and we all know how that series ended. I gotta stop believing stuff that the sports media writes, because it’s usually garbage and I’ve seen more intelligent journalism in blogs.

  • Man, I’m on a roll. You can’t get much more wrong than this. Let’s see if my jinx can continue: I’m calling the Rays in 6. They really deserve it, they’ve been trying for 10 whole years and they have such a loyal fanbase that fills their stadium almost 50% full sometimes. Plus they’ve got Jesus on their side ever since dropping that evil “Devil” part of their team’s name. Have at it, kids.

  • Hahahahaha!!! Lots and lots of cowbells will be showing up on eBay now. I like it!

    Kudos to the Phillies.

  • It’s the year of the Philly cheesesteak. They beat those stupid Rays!